6740624a044bf

6740624a054fb
1 Guest is here.
 

6740624a05d86sarge945

6740624a05deb
I can understand wanting to get all the old stuff working well before implementing the newdark stuff.

But what I can't understand is showing it off in such an unfinished state.

I get that developers like to show off early versions of their work, but in this case it looks worse than any community modding guide made in the last decade.
6740624a060e9
The comments are super positive and people seem to think it looks incredible, so they did the right thing probably. I mean, it's System Shock 2, it will automagically get positive comments no matter what.

As someone who's been playing it with mods i didn't exactly fall of my chair in excitement to anything here.
From what i recall their version will be playable as vanilla or modded (they did ask for permission from me 3 years ago), but who knows, things change. I remember they also talked about VR.

6740624a06238voodoo47

6740624a06285
I'm guessing most of those positive comments come from people who never bothered to try any mods (there probably is a fairly large group of people who simply are stuck in the steam environment forever and will never try anything not released officially).

the current trailer shows a build that (apart from the AI models) actually is not even at the level of the current GOG/steam build with SHTUP and Tacticool. they have a lot of work ahead..

6740624a0656eZylonBane

6740624a065c3
The eyelids are opened a little wider and are rounded/more defined. The pupils have the same shape but are smaller and oriented more to the center and the irises have a visible pigment structure and the eyeballs are brightened.
Note in particular that each eye is the exact same image, just mirrored. They didn't even bother correcting the reflection.
6740624a0680f
voodoo47
Absolutely.. we are a very, very small minority.

6740624a06927icemann

6740624a06977
For me it looked like SS2 with mods and nothing more. Very underwhelming imo.
6740624a06bd9
With nothing being announced wrt NewDark support, I would expect that it's more or less off the table at this point. So, is there really a reason for this anymore? Would be cool to extract the updated models and offer them as mods for the original.

6740624a06c77voodoo47

6740624a06cc3
to be blunt, if EE has no ND support, then it's DOA. they can't afford that.
6740624a06d9d
I would have expected to see at least something in that capacity. Granted, I don't have the best eyes or memory anymore when it comes to SS2 modding, but I would have expected to see at least some results.

6740624a06e8dJosiahJack

6740624a06ed8
The NDS "trailer" looks indistinguishable from a let's play with mods from about 8yrs ago.
Acknowledged by 3 members: Marvin, icemann, Hikari

6740624a06f9dZylonBane

6740624a06fe9
These trailers are truly baffling. I get that they want to show "something" to maintain public awareness, but the main thing they have to show off at this point, the upgraded character and weapon models, they barely feature at all. Like you have to actively look for them.
6740624a0733b
With nothing being announced wrt NewDark support, I would expect that it's more or less off the table at this point. So, is there really a reason for this anymore? Would be cool to extract the updated models and offer them as mods for the original.

SS2 EE will be great for console only gamers, who otherwise haven't yet been able to play this all time classic. But I'd imagine that most potential purchasers on the PC would (reasonably) expect the EE version to be a genuine upgrade to the already available and inexpensive 1999 release, but I doubt that that trailer will excite anyone.

And we're still waiting for a release date for the console versions of System Shock Remake. The PSN (Playstation Network) store doesn't even acknowledge it's existence.

Edit: Largely off topic, I know, but does anyone know where we stand with System Shock 3? Is it still in production, do we know who now owns the rights to it and whatever work was done on it before the buyout a few years back?
6740624a07610
Edit: Largely off topic, I know, but does anyone know where we stand with System Shock 3? Is it still in production, do we know who now owns the rights to it and whatever work was done on it before the buyout a few years back?
Last I heard, the rights of developing a sequel would have reverted back to Tencent, which bought and licensed them to Otherside in the first place. Expectedly, nothing has come of it so far.

6740624a077c6eldrone

6740624a07821
Because you guys would be most knowledgeable about this:

Turrets inherit from monsters and are tagged as movable, but this means they're excluded from lightmap baking.
So just testing to set them to immovable, and relighting, it seems they still work as intended. Any downsides to this?

alternatively, the force static shadow property.

6740624a0790fvoodoo47

6740624a07962
hmm, very sure we have considered something similar (corpses casting shadows), but decided to not implement in the end - will have to search the dev topics unless ZB remembers off the top of his head. does the shadow look ok when the turret is firing and exploding?

it would definitely conflict with a not-yet-existing Repairman mod update that would allow the player to lug turrets around (strength 6 and repair 6, probably).

6740624a07c19eldrone

6740624a07c7b
hmm, very sure we have considered something similar (corpses casting shadows), but decided to not implement in the end - will have to search the dev topics unless ZB remembers off the top of his head. does the shadow look ok when the turret is firing and exploding?

it would definitely conflict with a not-yet-existing Repairman mod update that would allow the player to lug turrets around (strength 6 and repair 6, probably).

Yeah, those kind of things are what I'm thinking about!

Since the turret leaves a chunk when destroyed, it still works visually, and moving around and firing doesn't break the illusion with the shadow.

But it would break compatibility with mods like the one mentioned.

6740624a07ee1ThiefsieFool

6740624a07f40
In the vanilla gamesys the turret corpses don't have Physics->Model->Controls->Location set, so they can be very slowly nudged once they've been destroyed. You could either change that or just leave it since it's a very obscure interaction.

6740624a08031voodoo47

6740624a0807e
as a (SCP) rule of thumb, if something is cool but may cause mods to break, then it's better off left alone.

there are exceptions though - if it's really cool, then it may get implemented and all mods are updated accordingly. the shotgun muzzle flash is a good example.

that wouldn't help in this scenario though - you make the turrets cast a shadow, and whichever mod decides to move them is now done, off the compatibility list forever.

6740624a082e5sarge945

6740624a08337
as a (SCP) rule of thumb, if something is cool but may cause mods to break, then it's better off left alone.

there are exceptions though - if it's really cool, then it may get implemented and all mods are updated accordingly. the shotgun muzzle flash is a good example.

that wouldn't help in this scenario though - you make the turrets cast a shadow, and whichever mod decides to move them is now done, off the compatibility list forever.

Not to mention various mods (wink wink) which may replace turrets with new ones entirely.
Acknowledged by: voodoo47

6740624a083fcZylonBane

6740624a08453
There are some excellent arguments to be made against adding turret shadows, but I don't need to make any of them because of one simple fact: Turret corpses can be psi pulled.
Acknowledged by: Chandlermaki

6740624a0874dsarge945

6740624a087a0
There are some excellent arguments to be made against adding turret shadows, but I don't need to make any of them because of one simple fact: Turret corpses can be psi pulled.

Cool, but, why though?

6740624a08837ZylonBane

6740624a08893
For the same reason you can psi pull anything.

Your name:
This box must be left blank:

What does the U.N.N start with?:
1 Guest is here.
Urban living only works through a combination of both patience and consideration.
Contact SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies
FEEP
6740624a0986c