6745be0ae6203

6745be0ae7566
4 Guests are here.
 

Topic: SCP Beta 5/6 Issue Reporting
Page: « 1 ... 4 [5] 6 ... 12 »
Read 18612 times  

6745be0ae7e63voodoo47

Re: SCP Beta 5 Issue Reporting
6745be0ae7ed6
with all those pools around, who needs one?

6745be0ae8028Nameless Voice

Re: SCP Beta 5 Issue Reporting
6745be0ae809e
Or just walk a few metres to the elevator and another deck.
Re: SCP Beta 5 Issue Reporting
6745be0ae81f5
I'd suggest having a little Hydro2 bathroom purely as a "This is an dire emergency, I can't wait for an elevator to another deck, especially given how unreliable in-universe the VB mechanical systems are for crew" situation.

6745be0ae8412tiphares4

Re: SCP Beta 5 Issue Reporting
6745be0ae846d
Maybe one of the best places for bathroom would be this area↴; it always made the impression of being a waiting room or so.  Some additional (maybe defunct) Value Rep™ there would be nice also to breath more life into it.    Maybe even make some breakthrough to one of the adjacent rooms (the one where the totally destroyed replicator & toxin a vials are) - it could serve as auxiliary medical station canon wise - although this would heavy alteration of level geometry i guess.      :)
Acknowledged by 2 members: Chandlermaki, RoSoDude

6745be0ae87aesarge945

Re: SCP Beta 5 Issue Reporting
6745be0ae8811
I'm okay with a bathroom being there.

Maybe some of the random floor items in the level could be moved there.
Re: SCP Beta 5 Issue Reporting
6745be0ae89fe
Yes, and a fair more chairs - make it a sort of rest area for short breaks for people working on the deck who want few minutes to relax.

6745be0ae8b8aZylonBane

Re: SCP Beta 5 Issue Reporting
6745be0ae8c05
You guys know there's a hallway on the opposite side of that wall, right? There is no "there" to put a bathroom there.

Also SCP added benches along that wall years ago.

6745be0ae8d69tiphares4

Re: SCP Beta 5 Issue Reporting
6745be0ae8de4
:l        One could shift the whole room/s a bit to the east↬↴ More place then - or place a bathroom in the upper area. I think it doesn't have to be a huge bathroom, think of those ones scattered across recreation deck - like that one in the Bonne Chance Lounge..
[R3.jpg expired]
[R2.jpg expired]
[R4.jpg expired]
[dump138.png expired]

6745be0ae8eebsarge945

Re: SCP Beta 5 Issue Reporting
6745be0ae8f41
The bathroom doesn't have to be in that specific spot. I guess I was more in favor of a bathroom on that deck in general.

But uhhh....there's also plenty of pot plants, I guess.

6745be0ae9020ZylonBane

Re: SCP Beta 5 Issue Reporting
6745be0ae906f
Emissive material lighting in Dark? Sure, why not.

Acknowledged by 2 members: Chandlermaki, sarge945

6745be0ae90fevoodoo47

Re: SCP Beta 5 Issue Reporting
6745be0ae914c
why not indeed.

6745be0ae91daNameless Voice

Re: SCP Beta 5 Issue Reporting
6745be0ae9228
Does the colour change if you shoot the screen?

6745be0ae92f1ZylonBane

Re: SCP Beta 5 Issue Reporting
6745be0ae9340
Memo to self: Make screen invulnerable.
Acknowledged by: Nameless Voice

6745be0ae93f9ZylonBane

Re: SCP Beta 5 Issue Reporting
6745be0ae946a
Anyone else find it distractingly odd that the Midwife organ requires no chemicals to research? Considering how numerous, dangerous, and complex they are, you'd think the game would make players go fetch at least one chemical to get that sweet damage bonus.

6745be0ae9514voodoo47

Re: SCP Beta 5 Issue Reporting
6745be0ae9561
considering how long it takes to research the organ, I'd say this is intentional. nothing needed but takes forever.

6745be0ae9851sarge945

Re: SCP Beta 5 Issue Reporting
6745be0ae98ad
Anyone else find it distractingly odd that the Midwife organ requires no chemicals to research? Considering how numerous, dangerous, and complex they are, you'd think the game would make players go fetch at least one chemical to get that sweet damage bonus.

I would suggest swapping the themical requirement with the useless worms. So they require nothing to research, and the midwife requires whatever they required.

6745be0ae9969ZylonBane

Re: SCP Beta 5 Issue Reporting
6745be0ae99b9
There has been some internal discussion regarding adding a feature to automatically move AIs away the QBR when the player dies and respawns, to prevent situations where the player gets trapped in a spawn-camp loop.

Would this be a welcome change?

6745be0ae9a8dZylonBane

Re: SCP Beta 5 Issue Reporting
6745be0ae9ade
I was just thinking, it's hardly fair that card slots get to show their locked/unlocked status, but keypads don't.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GM562fHV5bo
Too much?
Acknowledged by: tiphares4

6745be0ae9b89Nameless Voice

Re: SCP Beta 5 Issue Reporting
6745be0ae9be3
I like it, but it kind of draws attention to the fact that the keypads generally stay unlocked forever after you enter the code once - which was never exactly realistic.

6745be0ae9cc9ZylonBane

Re: SCP Beta 5 Issue Reporting
6745be0ae9d1e
Well, keycard doors do the same thing. Swipe once, unlocked forever.

A way in which they do differ is that keypad doors mostly stay open after being unlocked, unlike keycard doors, which mostly behave like normal doors after being unlocked. I have considered changing this to make keypad door behavior consistent with the other door types.

6745be0ae9fbbsarge945

Re: SCP Beta 5 Issue Reporting
6745be0aea014
I was just thinking, it's hardly fair that card slots get to show their locked/unlocked status, but keypads don't.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GM562fHV5bo
Too much?

don't waste time patting yourself on the back.

6745be0aea599ZylonBane

Re: SCP Beta 5 Issue Reporting
6745be0aea5ed
Speaking of keypads, their behavior across the game is an absolute mess from a consistency standpoint.

On the surface, you'd expect keypad doors to act just like keycard doors. That is, once unlocked they behave exactly like any other door. This behavior of keycard doors is almost (but not entirely) consistent across the entire vanilla game. But that consistency only happened because of a feature of the card slot script: After being unlocked, it will pass along any TurnOn/TurnOff messages it receives. So mission authors could easily wire up keycard doors like so:

tripwire --> card slot --> door

Thus automatically allowing the tripwire to control the door after the card slot is unlocked. But the keypad script, inexplicably, DOES NOT have this message-forwarding feature. It will pop open the door on initially entering the correct code or hacking the keypad, but any functionality beyond that is left up to the mission author.

Unsurprisingly, most authors decided it wasn't worth the effort to work around this shortcoming of the script, but some did, and none of them did it the same way. Which gave us this mess:
earth/266: no code (Navy training)
- Closes: On timer after hacking. Closes and becomes locked again after three seconds.
- Open from inside: Button
- Open from outside: Must hack again

medsci1/1681: 45100 (Cryo Recovery A)
- Closes: Never
- Open from inside: n/a
- Open from outside: n/a

medsci1/222: 00000 (Cryo Retraining Storage; code never given)
- Closes: Never
- Open from inside: n/a
- Open from outside: n/a

medsci1/809: 12451 (Maintenance Access Shaft)
- Closes: Never
- Open from inside: n/a
- Open from outside: n/a

medsci2/1148: 98383 (Sub-armory; unhackable)
- Closes: Exit tripwire on inside
- Open from inside: Enter tripwire
- Open from outside: Frob keypad

eng1/1372: 59004 (Utility Storage 4)
- Closes: Exit tripwire spanning both sides
- Open from inside: Enter tripwire
- Open from outside: Enter tripwire or frob keypad

eng1/1500: 00000 (Utility Storage ?; door already open)
- Nonfunctional

eng1/1726: 34760 (Aux. Storage 5; unhackable)
- Closes: Never
- Open from inside: n/a
- Open from outside: n/a

eng1/1181: 15061 (Engineering Control; unhackable)
- Closes: Never
- Open from inside: n/a
- Open from outside: n/a

eng1/910: 94834 (Engineering Override; unhackable)
- Closes: Never
- Open from inside: n/a
- Open from outside: n/a

rec1/1955: 11111 (Crew Annex)
- Closes: Never
- Open from inside: n/a (but there's a button on the inside wired up to open the door if it's closed)
- Open from outside: n/a

rec1/270: 12345 (Crew Safe; code never given)
- Closes: Never
- Open from inside: n/a
- Open from outside: n/a

rec2/624: 50220 (Maintenance Access Shaft; broken; code never given)
- Closes: Timer (10 seconds)
- Open from inside: Button
- Open from outside: Frob keypad

rec2/122: 34093 (Garden maintenance tunnel)
- Closes: Never
- Open from inside: n/a
- Open from outside: n/a

ops4/333: 13433 (Weapons lockup)
- Closes: Timer (8 seconds)
- Open from inside: Button
- Open from outside: Frob keypad

command2/1609: 83273 (Security Station)
- Closes: Never
- Open from inside: n/a (but there's a tripwire across the door wired to the keypad)
- Open from outside: n/a (ditto)
So  yeah... I normally prefer to go with "majority rules" when making things consistent, but of the keypad doors where the author tried to make them behave realistically, there is no majority, even within the same map!

I'd say it comes down to a choice between two approaches:
  • Make them behave exactly like keycard doors.
    • Pro: Safest and simplest
    • Con: Would require stripping out a few existing buttons
  • Make them close behind you when walking through the door, then require explicitly frobbing either the keypad from the outside or a button from the inside to re-open the door.
    • Pro: Differentiates keypad-secured areas from keycard-secured areas, making them feel more like the extra-secure locations they're supposed to be
    • Con: Would require adding a lot of buttons

AAAAaaaggghhh....

6745be0aea69btiphares4

Re: SCP Beta 5 Issue Reporting
6745be0aea6ea
choice no. 2 would be so cool.. more immersion    :3

6745be0aea785sarge945

Re: SCP Beta 5 Issue Reporting
6745be0aea7d2
This all sounds like an elaborate conspiracy to force me to update my No Keypad Cheese mod.

Your name:
This box must be left blank:

In which year was System Shock released:
4 Guests are here.
Ideas don't determine who is right. Power determines who is right. And I have the power so I am right -Jonathan Irons
Contact SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies
FEEP
6745be0aebcff