673f8b6d9e070

673f8b6d9f6ae
14 Guests are here.
 

673f8b6d9fd4eZylonBane

673f8b6d9fdb9
The yellow wedge lights don't bother me, since the light from them actually is pretty dim. The yellow hanging lights do though, because they're transparent (unlike their white versions).

673f8b6da00aeSystem Shocked

673f8b6da010c
It's exactly the same but with a white light surface instead of grey.

If that doesn't satisfy your curiosity, it'd take you like 60 seconds to download it and try it.

I'm a noob (except for the downloading part). How would I be able to do that?
« Last Edit: 14. July 2014, 23:11:14 by System Shocked »

673f8b6da0344System Shocked

673f8b6da0395
The yellow wedge lights don't bother me, since the light from them actually is pretty dim. The yellow hanging lights do though, because they're transparent (unlike their white versions).

For consistency, shouldn't all same model/type lights have the same attributes, appearance/lighting characteristics wise?

673f8b6da04d1voodoo47

673f8b6da0522
by downloading the attachment and dropping it into DataPermMods, DataTempMods, or any mod folder under obj.

673f8b6da05e4System Shocked

673f8b6da0640
I thought these new .bin files were being posted because Olfred had to rework them in some way in order to fix a problem.

Thanks, much obliged.
673f8b6da08f2
No, sometimes ZylonBane fixes minor things himself. Not everything is a request. 

673f8b6da09b4voodoo47

673f8b6da0a0e
was playing with the latest conduit parts (from v08), and while they seem to work reasonably well after the dml fix, I still think a 1:1 replacement would be preferable.
673f8b6da0b25
1:1 is not viable because the original model is just too small.
And it was bugging out on the physdim already anyway.
Acknowledged by: voodoo47

673f8b6da0ea2voodoo47

673f8b6da0ef9
Here's a version of the wedge wall light (-978) modified so the "light" surface is full white, instead of the dull grey in the default model. Now it matches all the other white light models.
unless I'm mistaken, you have used the old, unfixed model with missing back side. the fixed one is here.

also, attaching three SHTUP models that need the same treatment as their orig equivalents - lights missing back sides, bulk switch the same.
« Last Edit: 20. July 2014, 20:45:13 by voodoo47 »

673f8b6da0ff7ZylonBane

673f8b6da1047
Oops, yeah, I did. Probably best to make the change properly in Blender than to run the upgraded model through bintoe/bsp.

673f8b6da10d5voodoo47

673f8b6da1121
well then, Olfred, would you kindly.
673f8b6da1205
What's so special about the SHTUP models that they can't use the original ones?

673f8b6da12c2voodoo47

673f8b6da1310
SHTUP enhances some of the obj textures, and the modified models are required to load them properly. for example, the orig wedge light has only a single color glass, while the SHTUP model uses a full texture.

673f8b6da13afZylonBane

673f8b6da1406
The original wedge light uses a texture. It's just a solid-colored one.
673f8b6da14ff
Here are the light models.

I didn't saw any difference on the shtup bulkdown so I left it out.

673f8b6da1762voodoo47

673f8b6da17b4
difference on the shtup bulkdown
no idea what difference between the orig and SHTUP bulkdown is, ZB would have to answer that.

673f8b6da1897ZylonBane

673f8b6da18ea
Hey Olfred, if you have some spare time, could you run a 16 x 16 surface subdivision on these models? It's just a couple of one-sided flats that I'd like to improve the lighting on. I know we tried this before with the teeth, but these objects don't move, and the exporter has gotten a lot better since then, so I figure it's worth another shot.

[qbr_walls.7z expired]
673f8b6da19fa
I also exported a new gizzard some while ago.
Did you ever tested that out?

673f8b6da1b55ZylonBane

673f8b6da1ba4
Just tried the updated gizzard. Still looks weird. I wouldn't worry about that one anymore, it's basically the worst-case scenario for this sort of thing-- an all-white object, in motion, with a bright light very close to its surface.

The QBR walls, on the other hand, are nearly a best-case scenario-- stationary objects, with dim light distant from the surface. Check it out:



The lighting is nearly indistinguishable from a lightmapped terrain surface. It even looks good when you go inside and look around. The visual artifact when shaded polygons cross a screen edge isn't noticeable at all, due to the minimal brightness changes across the surface.

So, success!  :thumb:
673f8b6da1c80
Sadly it's still lighted a tad differently.
Like a blueish tint.

673f8b6da1d05ZylonBane

673f8b6da1d9c
The last shot is from a different map.
673f8b6da1e95
Yeah, I know.
I was referring to the fact that you can clearly see that objects are lighted differently.

673f8b6da1f3aZylonBane

673f8b6da1f89
If you're just comparing the two object screenshots, then I'm not sure what you're lamenting. There's some blue on the back wall in both shots. That's because there's a blue light shining into the QBR booth.
673f8b6da205b
I'm comparing the object with the brush wall.

Your name:
This box must be left blank:

How can you challenge a perfect, _____ machine? (Fill in the missing word):
14 Guests are here.
does this mean something?
Contact SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies
FEEP
673f8b6da55c7