673f9201bea79

673f9201bfcb8
13 Guests are here.
 

673f9201c0492ZylonBane

673f9201c0500
The yellow wedge lights don't bother me, since the light from them actually is pretty dim. The yellow hanging lights do though, because they're transparent (unlike their white versions).

673f9201c0835System Shocked

673f9201c0893
It's exactly the same but with a white light surface instead of grey.

If that doesn't satisfy your curiosity, it'd take you like 60 seconds to download it and try it.

I'm a noob (except for the downloading part). How would I be able to do that?
« Last Edit: 14. July 2014, 23:11:14 by System Shocked »

673f9201c0ac7System Shocked

673f9201c0b23
The yellow wedge lights don't bother me, since the light from them actually is pretty dim. The yellow hanging lights do though, because they're transparent (unlike their white versions).

For consistency, shouldn't all same model/type lights have the same attributes, appearance/lighting characteristics wise?

673f9201c0c9avoodoo47

673f9201c0cf2
by downloading the attachment and dropping it into DataPermMods, DataTempMods, or any mod folder under obj.

673f9201c0dccSystem Shocked

673f9201c0e23
I thought these new .bin files were being posted because Olfred had to rework them in some way in order to fix a problem.

Thanks, much obliged.
673f9201c10d2
No, sometimes ZylonBane fixes minor things himself. Not everything is a request. 

673f9201c11f0voodoo47

673f9201c124b
was playing with the latest conduit parts (from v08), and while they seem to work reasonably well after the dml fix, I still think a 1:1 replacement would be preferable.
673f9201c1388
1:1 is not viable because the original model is just too small.
And it was bugging out on the physdim already anyway.
Acknowledged by: voodoo47

673f9201c16a0voodoo47

673f9201c16f8
Here's a version of the wedge wall light (-978) modified so the "light" surface is full white, instead of the dull grey in the default model. Now it matches all the other white light models.
unless I'm mistaken, you have used the old, unfixed model with missing back side. the fixed one is here.

also, attaching three SHTUP models that need the same treatment as their orig equivalents - lights missing back sides, bulk switch the same.
« Last Edit: 20. July 2014, 20:45:13 by voodoo47 »

673f9201c17f4ZylonBane

673f9201c184c
Oops, yeah, I did. Probably best to make the change properly in Blender than to run the upgraded model through bintoe/bsp.

673f9201c1909voodoo47

673f9201c1963
well then, Olfred, would you kindly.
673f9201c1a7c
What's so special about the SHTUP models that they can't use the original ones?

673f9201c1b61voodoo47

673f9201c1bb8
SHTUP enhances some of the obj textures, and the modified models are required to load them properly. for example, the orig wedge light has only a single color glass, while the SHTUP model uses a full texture.

673f9201c1c6cZylonBane

673f9201c1cbe
The original wedge light uses a texture. It's just a solid-colored one.
673f9201c1dd3
Here are the light models.

I didn't saw any difference on the shtup bulkdown so I left it out.

673f9201c2097voodoo47

673f9201c2135
difference on the shtup bulkdown
no idea what difference between the orig and SHTUP bulkdown is, ZB would have to answer that.

673f9201c2268ZylonBane

673f9201c22c4
Hey Olfred, if you have some spare time, could you run a 16 x 16 surface subdivision on these models? It's just a couple of one-sided flats that I'd like to improve the lighting on. I know we tried this before with the teeth, but these objects don't move, and the exporter has gotten a lot better since then, so I figure it's worth another shot.

[qbr_walls.7z expired]
673f9201c23d6
I also exported a new gizzard some while ago.
Did you ever tested that out?

673f9201c25bcZylonBane

673f9201c260a
Just tried the updated gizzard. Still looks weird. I wouldn't worry about that one anymore, it's basically the worst-case scenario for this sort of thing-- an all-white object, in motion, with a bright light very close to its surface.

The QBR walls, on the other hand, are nearly a best-case scenario-- stationary objects, with dim light distant from the surface. Check it out:



The lighting is nearly indistinguishable from a lightmapped terrain surface. It even looks good when you go inside and look around. The visual artifact when shaded polygons cross a screen edge isn't noticeable at all, due to the minimal brightness changes across the surface.

So, success!  :thumb:
673f9201c2745
Sadly it's still lighted a tad differently.
Like a blueish tint.

673f9201c27d9ZylonBane

673f9201c2828
The last shot is from a different map.
673f9201c291f
Yeah, I know.
I was referring to the fact that you can clearly see that objects are lighted differently.

673f9201c29d4ZylonBane

673f9201c2a21
If you're just comparing the two object screenshots, then I'm not sure what you're lamenting. There's some blue on the back wall in both shots. That's because there's a blue light shining into the QBR booth.
673f9201c2b15
I'm comparing the object with the brush wall.

Your name:
This box must be left blank:

How can you challenge a perfect, immortal ____? (Fill in the missing word):
13 Guests are here.
I decided I wanted to know how it worked.
Contact SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies
FEEP
673f9201c3910