673f8fd0d290c

673f8fd0d3dab
15 Guests are here.
 

673f8fd0d4486ZylonBane

673f8fd0d44f6
The yellow wedge lights don't bother me, since the light from them actually is pretty dim. The yellow hanging lights do though, because they're transparent (unlike their white versions).

673f8fd0d4768System Shocked

673f8fd0d47c1
It's exactly the same but with a white light surface instead of grey.

If that doesn't satisfy your curiosity, it'd take you like 60 seconds to download it and try it.

I'm a noob (except for the downloading part). How would I be able to do that?
« Last Edit: 14. July 2014, 23:11:14 by System Shocked »

673f8fd0d49ccSystem Shocked

673f8fd0d4a5e
The yellow wedge lights don't bother me, since the light from them actually is pretty dim. The yellow hanging lights do though, because they're transparent (unlike their white versions).

For consistency, shouldn't all same model/type lights have the same attributes, appearance/lighting characteristics wise?

673f8fd0d4b96voodoo47

673f8fd0d4be6
by downloading the attachment and dropping it into DataPermMods, DataTempMods, or any mod folder under obj.

673f8fd0d4c8dSystem Shocked

673f8fd0d4cd9
I thought these new .bin files were being posted because Olfred had to rework them in some way in order to fix a problem.

Thanks, much obliged.
673f8fd0d4f4e
No, sometimes ZylonBane fixes minor things himself. Not everything is a request. 

673f8fd0d4ffavoodoo47

673f8fd0d5046
was playing with the latest conduit parts (from v08), and while they seem to work reasonably well after the dml fix, I still think a 1:1 replacement would be preferable.
673f8fd0d5136
1:1 is not viable because the original model is just too small.
And it was bugging out on the physdim already anyway.
Acknowledged by: voodoo47

673f8fd0d555cvoodoo47

673f8fd0d55b2
Here's a version of the wedge wall light (-978) modified so the "light" surface is full white, instead of the dull grey in the default model. Now it matches all the other white light models.
unless I'm mistaken, you have used the old, unfixed model with missing back side. the fixed one is here.

also, attaching three SHTUP models that need the same treatment as their orig equivalents - lights missing back sides, bulk switch the same.
« Last Edit: 20. July 2014, 20:45:13 by voodoo47 »

673f8fd0d5691ZylonBane

673f8fd0d56e6
Oops, yeah, I did. Probably best to make the change properly in Blender than to run the upgraded model through bintoe/bsp.

673f8fd0d5779voodoo47

673f8fd0d57c8
well then, Olfred, would you kindly.
673f8fd0d58ab
What's so special about the SHTUP models that they can't use the original ones?

673f8fd0d5955voodoo47

673f8fd0d59da
SHTUP enhances some of the obj textures, and the modified models are required to load them properly. for example, the orig wedge light has only a single color glass, while the SHTUP model uses a full texture.

673f8fd0d5a7dZylonBane

673f8fd0d5acd
The original wedge light uses a texture. It's just a solid-colored one.
673f8fd0d5bc6
Here are the light models.

I didn't saw any difference on the shtup bulkdown so I left it out.

673f8fd0d5df9voodoo47

673f8fd0d5e68
difference on the shtup bulkdown
no idea what difference between the orig and SHTUP bulkdown is, ZB would have to answer that.

673f8fd0d5f4dZylonBane

673f8fd0d5f9b
Hey Olfred, if you have some spare time, could you run a 16 x 16 surface subdivision on these models? It's just a couple of one-sided flats that I'd like to improve the lighting on. I know we tried this before with the teeth, but these objects don't move, and the exporter has gotten a lot better since then, so I figure it's worth another shot.

[qbr_walls.7z expired]
673f8fd0d6086
I also exported a new gizzard some while ago.
Did you ever tested that out?

673f8fd0d61d6ZylonBane

673f8fd0d6227
Just tried the updated gizzard. Still looks weird. I wouldn't worry about that one anymore, it's basically the worst-case scenario for this sort of thing-- an all-white object, in motion, with a bright light very close to its surface.

The QBR walls, on the other hand, are nearly a best-case scenario-- stationary objects, with dim light distant from the surface. Check it out:



The lighting is nearly indistinguishable from a lightmapped terrain surface. It even looks good when you go inside and look around. The visual artifact when shaded polygons cross a screen edge isn't noticeable at all, due to the minimal brightness changes across the surface.

So, success!  :thumb:
673f8fd0d6308
Sadly it's still lighted a tad differently.
Like a blueish tint.

673f8fd0d6390ZylonBane

673f8fd0d63dd
The last shot is from a different map.
673f8fd0d64cc
Yeah, I know.
I was referring to the fact that you can clearly see that objects are lighted differently.

673f8fd0d65c8ZylonBane

673f8fd0d6627
If you're just comparing the two object screenshots, then I'm not sure what you're lamenting. There's some blue on the back wall in both shots. That's because there's a blue light shining into the QBR booth.
673f8fd0d6749
I'm comparing the object with the brush wall.

Your name:
This box must be left blank:

Trioptimum executive Edward ____ (Fill in the last name):
15 Guests are here.
Feed your eyes on cold grey city concrete
Contact SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies
FEEP
673f8fd0d977d