67367d7b2bd1b

67367d7b2cb16
10 Guests are here.
 

67367d7b2d1fcZylonBane

67367d7b2d25d
The yellow wedge lights don't bother me, since the light from them actually is pretty dim. The yellow hanging lights do though, because they're transparent (unlike their white versions).

67367d7b2d50cSystem Shocked

67367d7b2d59f
It's exactly the same but with a white light surface instead of grey.

If that doesn't satisfy your curiosity, it'd take you like 60 seconds to download it and try it.

I'm a noob (except for the downloading part). How would I be able to do that?
« Last Edit: 14. July 2014, 23:11:14 by System Shocked »

67367d7b2d7f4System Shocked

67367d7b2d84e
The yellow wedge lights don't bother me, since the light from them actually is pretty dim. The yellow hanging lights do though, because they're transparent (unlike their white versions).

For consistency, shouldn't all same model/type lights have the same attributes, appearance/lighting characteristics wise?

67367d7b2d9b2voodoo47

67367d7b2da04
by downloading the attachment and dropping it into DataPermMods, DataTempMods, or any mod folder under obj.

67367d7b2dab3System Shocked

67367d7b2db01
I thought these new .bin files were being posted because Olfred had to rework them in some way in order to fix a problem.

Thanks, much obliged.
67367d7b2de0f
No, sometimes ZylonBane fixes minor things himself. Not everything is a request. 

67367d7b2df35voodoo47

67367d7b2df98
was playing with the latest conduit parts (from v08), and while they seem to work reasonably well after the dml fix, I still think a 1:1 replacement would be preferable.
67367d7b2e0d5
1:1 is not viable because the original model is just too small.
And it was bugging out on the physdim already anyway.
Acknowledged by: voodoo47

67367d7b2e36evoodoo47

67367d7b2e3c3
Here's a version of the wedge wall light (-978) modified so the "light" surface is full white, instead of the dull grey in the default model. Now it matches all the other white light models.
unless I'm mistaken, you have used the old, unfixed model with missing back side. the fixed one is here.

also, attaching three SHTUP models that need the same treatment as their orig equivalents - lights missing back sides, bulk switch the same.
« Last Edit: 20. July 2014, 20:45:13 by voodoo47 »

67367d7b2e49eZylonBane

67367d7b2e4ef
Oops, yeah, I did. Probably best to make the change properly in Blender than to run the upgraded model through bintoe/bsp.

67367d7b2e57evoodoo47

67367d7b2e5cb
well then, Olfred, would you kindly.
67367d7b2e6bc
What's so special about the SHTUP models that they can't use the original ones?

67367d7b2e7bevoodoo47

67367d7b2e818
SHTUP enhances some of the obj textures, and the modified models are required to load them properly. for example, the orig wedge light has only a single color glass, while the SHTUP model uses a full texture.

67367d7b2e8d6ZylonBane

67367d7b2e927
The original wedge light uses a texture. It's just a solid-colored one.
67367d7b2ea35
Here are the light models.

I didn't saw any difference on the shtup bulkdown so I left it out.

67367d7b2ecbevoodoo47

67367d7b2ed2c
difference on the shtup bulkdown
no idea what difference between the orig and SHTUP bulkdown is, ZB would have to answer that.

67367d7b2ee7dZylonBane

67367d7b2eece
Hey Olfred, if you have some spare time, could you run a 16 x 16 surface subdivision on these models? It's just a couple of one-sided flats that I'd like to improve the lighting on. I know we tried this before with the teeth, but these objects don't move, and the exporter has gotten a lot better since then, so I figure it's worth another shot.

[qbr_walls.7z expired]
67367d7b2efd1
I also exported a new gizzard some while ago.
Did you ever tested that out?

67367d7b2f1e6ZylonBane

67367d7b2f243
Just tried the updated gizzard. Still looks weird. I wouldn't worry about that one anymore, it's basically the worst-case scenario for this sort of thing-- an all-white object, in motion, with a bright light very close to its surface.

The QBR walls, on the other hand, are nearly a best-case scenario-- stationary objects, with dim light distant from the surface. Check it out:



The lighting is nearly indistinguishable from a lightmapped terrain surface. It even looks good when you go inside and look around. The visual artifact when shaded polygons cross a screen edge isn't noticeable at all, due to the minimal brightness changes across the surface.

So, success!  :thumb:
67367d7b2f33c
Sadly it's still lighted a tad differently.
Like a blueish tint.

67367d7b2f3d9ZylonBane

67367d7b2f428
The last shot is from a different map.
67367d7b2f51e
Yeah, I know.
I was referring to the fact that you can clearly see that objects are lighted differently.

67367d7b2f5caZylonBane

67367d7b2f616
If you're just comparing the two object screenshots, then I'm not sure what you're lamenting. There's some blue on the back wall in both shots. That's because there's a blue light shining into the QBR booth.
67367d7b2f6ed
I'm comparing the object with the brush wall.

Your name:
This box must be left blank:

In which year was System Shock 2 released:
10 Guests are here.
"Consistency Adams!" "That's called logic Erickson!"
Contact SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies
FEEP
67367d7b3077a