673f941c7c760

673f941c7da7c
20 Guests are here.
 

673f941c7e263ZylonBane

673f941c7e2d3
The yellow wedge lights don't bother me, since the light from them actually is pretty dim. The yellow hanging lights do though, because they're transparent (unlike their white versions).

673f941c7e5b0System Shocked

673f941c7e69d
It's exactly the same but with a white light surface instead of grey.

If that doesn't satisfy your curiosity, it'd take you like 60 seconds to download it and try it.

I'm a noob (except for the downloading part). How would I be able to do that?
« Last Edit: 14. July 2014, 23:11:14 by System Shocked »

673f941c7e913System Shocked

673f941c7e970
The yellow wedge lights don't bother me, since the light from them actually is pretty dim. The yellow hanging lights do though, because they're transparent (unlike their white versions).

For consistency, shouldn't all same model/type lights have the same attributes, appearance/lighting characteristics wise?

673f941c7eafbvoodoo47

673f941c7eb5c
by downloading the attachment and dropping it into DataPermMods, DataTempMods, or any mod folder under obj.

673f941c7ec40System Shocked

673f941c7ec9c
I thought these new .bin files were being posted because Olfred had to rework them in some way in order to fix a problem.

Thanks, much obliged.
673f941c7ef81
No, sometimes ZylonBane fixes minor things himself. Not everything is a request. 

673f941c7f05dvoodoo47

673f941c7f0b5
was playing with the latest conduit parts (from v08), and while they seem to work reasonably well after the dml fix, I still think a 1:1 replacement would be preferable.
673f941c7f1d4
1:1 is not viable because the original model is just too small.
And it was bugging out on the physdim already anyway.
Acknowledged by: voodoo47

673f941c7f4a8voodoo47

673f941c7f505
Here's a version of the wedge wall light (-978) modified so the "light" surface is full white, instead of the dull grey in the default model. Now it matches all the other white light models.
unless I'm mistaken, you have used the old, unfixed model with missing back side. the fixed one is here.

also, attaching three SHTUP models that need the same treatment as their orig equivalents - lights missing back sides, bulk switch the same.
« Last Edit: 20. July 2014, 20:45:13 by voodoo47 »

673f941c7f622ZylonBane

673f941c7f67c
Oops, yeah, I did. Probably best to make the change properly in Blender than to run the upgraded model through bintoe/bsp.

673f941c7f72bvoodoo47

673f941c7f780
well then, Olfred, would you kindly.
673f941c7f888
What's so special about the SHTUP models that they can't use the original ones?

673f941c7f95bvoodoo47

673f941c7f9b0
SHTUP enhances some of the obj textures, and the modified models are required to load them properly. for example, the orig wedge light has only a single color glass, while the SHTUP model uses a full texture.

673f941c7fa9aZylonBane

673f941c7faf4
The original wedge light uses a texture. It's just a solid-colored one.
673f941c7fc25
Here are the light models.

I didn't saw any difference on the shtup bulkdown so I left it out.

673f941c7feeevoodoo47

673f941c7ff59
difference on the shtup bulkdown
no idea what difference between the orig and SHTUP bulkdown is, ZB would have to answer that.

673f941c8004eZylonBane

673f941c800a3
Hey Olfred, if you have some spare time, could you run a 16 x 16 surface subdivision on these models? It's just a couple of one-sided flats that I'd like to improve the lighting on. I know we tried this before with the teeth, but these objects don't move, and the exporter has gotten a lot better since then, so I figure it's worth another shot.

[qbr_walls.7z expired]
673f941c801b9
I also exported a new gizzard some while ago.
Did you ever tested that out?

673f941c80319ZylonBane

673f941c80369
Just tried the updated gizzard. Still looks weird. I wouldn't worry about that one anymore, it's basically the worst-case scenario for this sort of thing-- an all-white object, in motion, with a bright light very close to its surface.

The QBR walls, on the other hand, are nearly a best-case scenario-- stationary objects, with dim light distant from the surface. Check it out:



The lighting is nearly indistinguishable from a lightmapped terrain surface. It even looks good when you go inside and look around. The visual artifact when shaded polygons cross a screen edge isn't noticeable at all, due to the minimal brightness changes across the surface.

So, success!  :thumb:
673f941c8044f
Sadly it's still lighted a tad differently.
Like a blueish tint.

673f941c804eaZylonBane

673f941c8053a
The last shot is from a different map.
673f941c80664
Yeah, I know.
I was referring to the fact that you can clearly see that objects are lighted differently.

673f941c80731ZylonBane

673f941c80784
If you're just comparing the two object screenshots, then I'm not sure what you're lamenting. There's some blue on the back wall in both shots. That's because there's a blue light shining into the QBR booth.
673f941c80876
I'm comparing the object with the brush wall.

Your name:
This box must be left blank:

____ at you, hacker: a pathetic creature of meat and bone!  (Fill in the missing word):
20 Guests are here.
Fell down some stairs and woke up here.
Contact SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies
FEEP
673f941c846c4