673fa0d05dff4

673fa0d05f0a0
2 Guests are here.
 

673fa0d05f94fvoodoo47

673fa0d05f9b7
Note - this is now included in SCP, do not use unless you know what are doing.


so as we all know, Rickenbacker lacks proper maps, probably because of the time constraints. and it would be really nice to have them created - if available, we could implement them in SCP.

-must fit the general SS2 map aesthetics.
-must be reasonably accurate.
« Last Edit: 02. January 2024, 11:47:18 by voodoo47 »

673fa0d05fcdbunn_atropos

Re: New resource request - Rickenbacker maps
673fa0d05fd35
I would modestly suggest my Blueprints of the U.N.N. Rickenbacker for this.

673fa0d05fe65ZylonBane

Re: New resource request - Rickenbacker maps
673fa0d05feb1
I stand by my opinion that automapping rick1 in any sort of useful way is basically impossible. It's sliced into so many layers that to fit every layer into the map window they would all have to be ridiculously small. Rick2 and rick3 are the opposite-- they're so tiny that you don't even need a map.

673fa0d05ff5avoodoo47

Re: New resource request - Rickenbacker maps
673fa0d05ffa5
I'm quite sure that something could be done. somewhat accurate maps are still better than no-maps.

no such thing as perfection in this world.

673fa0d06003fZylonBane

Re: New resource request - Rickenbacker maps
673fa0d060088
The horror...
Re: New resource request - Rickenbacker maps
673fa0d0601d2
What about a sideview map?

673fa0d060279ZylonBane

Re: New resource request - Rickenbacker maps
673fa0d0602c2
1. Not technically possible (the player position marker is hardwired for X/Y coordinates)
2. Would be pretty much useless even if it could be done
Re: New resource request - Rickenbacker maps
673fa0d060405
Im pretty convinced that a map for Rickenbacker would actually make the player more confused than benefit for anything. As ZB is saying all the layers is the cause of this

673fa0d0604a2voodoo47

Re: New resource request - Rickenbacker maps
673fa0d0604eb
we don't know unless we try. and it's not like we are getting spammed by tons of user made Rick maps anytime soon.

673fa0d06082dZylonBane

Re: New resource request - Rickenbacker maps
673fa0d060882
Im pretty convinced that a map for Rickenbacker would actually make the player more confused than benefit for anything. As ZB is saying all the layers is the cause of this
Uh, no. What I'm saying is that rick1 has so many layers, and each layer is so large, that it's physically impossible to fit them on the map screen at a useful size. It's a really, really, big map. Probably the biggest in the game. When you view it in DromEd it looks like a freaking Borg cube.

Even if there was a way to fit everything in at a useful size, it would then require manually setting the map IDs on hundreds of room brushes. A huge amount of effort for barely any benefit to the player since most of rick1 is linear.

673fa0d060c5eGrosnus

Re: New resource request - Rickenbacker maps
673fa0d060cad
This is my best attempt at making this happen:









Deck A is basically a giant cluster of insets, but instead of showing that in a standard way, I decided to seperate map into layers and only show specific "sub-insets" for each layer.
Something similar was done here: https://www.systemshock.org/index.php?topic=2049

A few areas accessible by ladder are intentionally skipped which is not uncommon in vanilla maps anyway. I was even thinking about merging Nacelle B tunnels into one area intead of 3 - in current form it might be even more confusing with automap than without. Besides, I feel there's way too many numbers in the map already.
I tried to keep the style as close as possible to original, so I had to stick to several "rules" of layouting, which only made it more difficult to fit everything in. In the end the scale isn't that bad - Rec2 map has even smaller elements than this.

All rooms and markers are set in .mis files, so everything should work fine. I had to split a lot of room brushes into smaller boxes to match map segments. It's based on SCP maps, so SCP will be required to try it out.
I don't think new automaps are going to work in saves, so new game is also required, at least from my experience.

Overall it works much better during gameplay - even though Rickenbacker is very linear, uncovering new areas gives a nice sense of exploration - something I always liked in games with maps like this.
[Rickenbacker_automaps.zip expired]
« Last Edit: 15. February 2018, 19:14:32 by Grosnus »
Acknowledged by 5 members: JML, unn_atropos, hemebond, edx, RoSoDude

673fa0d060d40ZylonBane

Re: New resource request - Rickenbacker maps
673fa0d060d88
Holy cow.

673fa0d060e43voodoo47

Re: New resource request - Rickenbacker maps
673fa0d060e8c
what he said. based on beta4 maps, I would assume? //yes. also, if you are using SHTUP, the intrface folder from the archive needs to be copied there as well.

saves from before entering Rick for the first time should be fine.
« Last Edit: 15. February 2018, 07:53:44 by voodoo47 »
673fa0d0610e5
I guess Christmas is coming early to the SSorg community this year, what with the logo update and now this.

673fa0d061188voodoo47

673fa0d0611d0
yeah - pretty sure we'll want to release the next version of SCP sooner than Halloween this year.
Acknowledged by: JML

673fa0d061404Grosnus

673fa0d061452
also, if you are using SHTUP, the intrface folder from the archive needs to be copied there as well.

What do you mean exactly, copied to where? Is there some sort of compatibility issue?
Also, I just noticed there's typo in rick2 map, I'll fix it later today.

673fa0d061578voodoo47

673fa0d0615c1
yeah, because I've added the files directly to SCP, so SHTUP overrode (woah, that's an actual word) the new maps. should be ok as long as you use the maps as a standalone mod. anyway, it's nothing you would need to be concerned about, we will merge the files properly for the upcoming SCP/SHTUP release(es).
673fa0d06192a
yeah - pretty sure we'll want to release the next version of SCP sooner than Halloween this year.
Don't let certain people hear that :o

And yeah, nice job on the map!

673fa0d0619deGrosnus

673fa0d061a27
Ok, the typo in rick2 is fixed now.
I updated the attachment in my first post.
Acknowledged by: voodoo47

673fa0d061ac2unn_atropos

673fa0d061b0c
Did you use my blueprints as a base? If so, my hours of useless work were not in vain after all  XD.

Indeed a awesome time to be a System Shock fan, with all the new shiny stuff coming out!

673fa0d061c42Grosnus

673fa0d061cbb
Your blueprints helped me get a sense of scale, especially for rick1. Thanks to that I was able to nail the scale in first try, otherwise if I made a mistake it would be very painful to redo everything  ;).

In the end I had to retrace all walls directly from missions, because there were some differences in the map vs the actual area where player can walk, e.g. the area around missile control room.
That was the fun part though, the worst was to divide room brushes into smaller chunks without introducing room errors  :carnage:.


673fa0d062068
Grosnus, that looks great (at least to my inexpert eyes). When you think about it, considering how small the SS2 fan-community is, we're incredibly lucky to have so many talented members prepared to give their time and effort to improve the game.
 

yeah - pretty sure we'll want to release the next version of SCP sooner than Halloween this year.

Or you could release a maintenance release (SSP beta 4.1?) any time you liked, instead of waiting until you feel enough of a milestone has been released to afford the jump to beta 5.
Acknowledged by 2 members: JML, icemann

673fa0d06211ealuminumhaste

673fa0d06216a
Holy crap that looks amazing!
I've downloaded the resource, but ummm, where do I stick it to get it working?
2 Guests are here.
I know this may sound weird but, these old graphics are kinda refreshing.
Contact SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies
FEEP
673fa0d062b34