673fe588888f3

673fe58889b66
1 Guest is here.
 

Topic: System Shock 1 with Mac assets? Read 14179 times  

673fe5888a284Hogdalen

673fe5888a2eb
Hi!

I just bought System Shock 1 Enhanced Edition, but it's not quite as I remember it. Has anyone attempted to mod it with the hi-res UI and portraits from the Mac version?

673fe5888a47fvoodoo47

673fe5888a4cf
I think it would have been done long time ago, should it be possible/easy.
« Last Edit: 30. September 2015, 08:10:48 by voodoo47 »

673fe5888a582Hogdalen

673fe5888a5d7
Heh. I think you mean 'should it be easy'. But fair enough. I suppose I should be content that the Mac version is now perfectly playable in SheepShaver. Perhaps it would be easier to hack mouselook into that version.

673fe5888a844unn_atropos

673fe5888a990Hogdalen

673fe5888a9da
Yeah, if you want to call 256-color, 640 x 480 pixels "hi-res". But I think they are twice the resolution of the DOS portraits.

Screen from Mac SS1 running under Sheepshaver.

EDIT: Added an attempt at a comparison shot from the DOS version.
« Last Edit: 27. September 2015, 14:28:19 by Hogdalen »

673fe5888aa9dvoodoo47

673fe5888aae6
I think hacking the higher resources out would be more viable.

673fe5888abd6Hogdalen

673fe5888ac21
Some more comparisons, just to show the cool title screens and a Mac screenshot with correct gamma.
[title.png expired]
[lookingglass.png expired]
[origin.png expired]
[rebecca.png expired]
« Last Edit: 27. September 2015, 16:45:53 by Hogdalen »
673fe5888ada7
I looked into this sometime ago. Most of the graphic assets seems to be in .rsrc files. I'm not Mac OS expert, but I think those can be extracted quite easily.
I will have to take another look someday.

673fe5888af1bZylonBane

673fe5888af6a
It would be nice to at least have the high-res assets. Perhaps a future revival of Citadel Conversion Project could use them.

Still, it doesn't seem impossible to make the DOS version use them. SS1's GUI code is actually more sophisticated than SS2's, in that it will automatically scale all HUD elements to the same relative size on-screen no matter what the screen resolution is. In low-res modes the log portraits get scaled down, and in high-res modes they get scaled up. It seems likely that if the higher-res Mac log portraits were hacked into the DOS version, a la the high-res object textures, it would properly use them with no further modifications.

Anyone know what tool Gigaquad used to modify the resource files?

673fe5888b08dJosiahJack

673fe5888b0d8
Ooh, higher res portraits for the log files would be much appreciated for the Citadel Remake project.  If anyone has them available for download, please let me know.

Incidentally, they look washed out on the Mac version.  Is that normal, or just how the screenshots turned out?

673fe5888b31cZylonBane

673fe5888b370
Incidentally, they look washed out on the Mac version.  Is that normal, or just how the screenshots turned out?
I'm trying to figure out how you noticed the log icon being washed out while not noticing the entire screen being washed out.

673fe5888b41cJosiahJack

673fe5888b469
Incidentally, the screenshots look washed out ...sigh...ambiguity.
673fe5888b610
The Mac logs and text are actually cleaner looking even in the gamma corrected shots. you won't get crysis level out of any of it, but I really do hope these assets can be ported into the windows version gog sells.
673fe5888b712
I extracted some of the resources using DeRez (comes with Xcode). Next step is to try to convert them to usable formats. Hopefully they are the same as in DOS version (reversed byte order perhaps). I will look into this later.

673fe5888b7a8Hogdalen

673fe5888b7f8
That is excellent news, Gawain! Looking forward to hearing your progress.

673fe5888b88dJosiahJack

673fe5888b8d9
Awesome!  It'd be great to use them for the remake.

673fe5888b9d9icemann

673fe5888ba26
Am I the only one who thinks the PC's assets look better?
Acknowledged by: Briareos H

673fe5888bb2bunn_atropos

673fe5888bba3
I wouldn't say better, but judging from the two portraits I've seen here, the mac versions look a bit more like they were drawn/painted instead of beeing photographs. Painted portraits may have a stronger association with games in the fantasy setting or the character design of early adventures, so they may seem a bit unfitting in a scifi game. Though I never had an issue with the drawn portraits in System Shock 2. They worked in favour of the cyberpunk style world, in my opinion.

673fe5888bc5aicemann

673fe5888bca4
Most definitely in the case of SS2. But in SS1's case, they went for the more realistic, photo approach. Gives the game it's own unique style artistically. Or to be more accurate, in the PC versions case, by the look of it.

673fe5888bd3dZylonBane

673fe5888bd88
Whoever was in charge of retouching the Mac version log portraits seemed to believe that all women should wear red lipstick.

673fe5888bed9ZylonBane

673fe5888bf28
Uh... what doesn't narrow what down? Were we trying to narrow something down?

673fe5888c298Hogdalen

673fe5888c2e4
This is pure speculation on my part, but if the Mac image resource format is not the same as in DOS , it might be PICT (v2).

Some more information on the PICT format.

Of course it might well be less work to take screenshots of the game running in SheepShaver rather than working out and converting the original format.
1 Guest is here.
damn straight he's shady!
Contact SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies
FEEP
673fe5888c7cf