66ea00136da6c

66ea00136e050
11 Guests are here.
 

Topic: System Shock 1 with Mac assets? Read 13254 times  

66ea00136e7a9Hogdalen

66ea00136e81b
Hi!

I just bought System Shock 1 Enhanced Edition, but it's not quite as I remember it. Has anyone attempted to mod it with the hi-res UI and portraits from the Mac version?

66ea00136e9e2voodoo47

66ea00136ea30
I think it would have been done long time ago, should it be possible/easy.
« Last Edit: 30. September 2015, 08:10:48 by voodoo47 »

66ea00136eae1Hogdalen

66ea00136eb4c
Heh. I think you mean 'should it be easy'. But fair enough. I suppose I should be content that the Mac version is now perfectly playable in SheepShaver. Perhaps it would be easier to hack mouselook into that version.

66ea00136ed6aunn_atropos

66ea00136ef07Hogdalen

66ea00136ef61
Yeah, if you want to call 256-color, 640 x 480 pixels "hi-res". But I think they are twice the resolution of the DOS portraits.

Screen from Mac SS1 running under Sheepshaver.

EDIT: Added an attempt at a comparison shot from the DOS version.
« Last Edit: 27. September 2015, 14:28:19 by Hogdalen »

66ea00136f044voodoo47

66ea00136f096
I think hacking the higher resources out would be more viable.

66ea00136f161Hogdalen

66ea00136f1af
Some more comparisons, just to show the cool title screens and a Mac screenshot with correct gamma.
[title.png expired]
[lookingglass.png expired]
[origin.png expired]
[rebecca.png expired]
« Last Edit: 27. September 2015, 16:45:53 by Hogdalen »
66ea00136f314
I looked into this sometime ago. Most of the graphic assets seems to be in .rsrc files. I'm not Mac OS expert, but I think those can be extracted quite easily.
I will have to take another look someday.

66ea00136f492ZylonBane

66ea00136f4dd
It would be nice to at least have the high-res assets. Perhaps a future revival of Citadel Conversion Project could use them.

Still, it doesn't seem impossible to make the DOS version use them. SS1's GUI code is actually more sophisticated than SS2's, in that it will automatically scale all HUD elements to the same relative size on-screen no matter what the screen resolution is. In low-res modes the log portraits get scaled down, and in high-res modes they get scaled up. It seems likely that if the higher-res Mac log portraits were hacked into the DOS version, a la the high-res object textures, it would properly use them with no further modifications.

Anyone know what tool Gigaquad used to modify the resource files?

66ea00136f609JosiahJack

66ea00136f65e
Ooh, higher res portraits for the log files would be much appreciated for the Citadel Remake project.  If anyone has them available for download, please let me know.

Incidentally, they look washed out on the Mac version.  Is that normal, or just how the screenshots turned out?

66ea00136f8e2ZylonBane

66ea00136f935
Incidentally, they look washed out on the Mac version.  Is that normal, or just how the screenshots turned out?
I'm trying to figure out how you noticed the log icon being washed out while not noticing the entire screen being washed out.

66ea00136f9e3JosiahJack

66ea00136fa38
Incidentally, the screenshots look washed out ...sigh...ambiguity.
66ea00136fba4
The Mac logs and text are actually cleaner looking even in the gamma corrected shots. you won't get crysis level out of any of it, but I really do hope these assets can be ported into the windows version gog sells.
66ea00136fcb2
I extracted some of the resources using DeRez (comes with Xcode). Next step is to try to convert them to usable formats. Hopefully they are the same as in DOS version (reversed byte order perhaps). I will look into this later.

66ea00136fd3eHogdalen

66ea00136fd88
That is excellent news, Gawain! Looking forward to hearing your progress.

66ea00136fe16JosiahJack

66ea00136fe67
Awesome!  It'd be great to use them for the remake.

66ea00136ff65icemann

66ea00136ffb1
Am I the only one who thinks the PC's assets look better?
Acknowledged by: Briareos H

66ea001370078unn_atropos

66ea0013700c8
I wouldn't say better, but judging from the two portraits I've seen here, the mac versions look a bit more like they were drawn/painted instead of beeing photographs. Painted portraits may have a stronger association with games in the fantasy setting or the character design of early adventures, so they may seem a bit unfitting in a scifi game. Though I never had an issue with the drawn portraits in System Shock 2. They worked in favour of the cyberpunk style world, in my opinion.

66ea00137017bicemann

66ea0013701c8
Most definitely in the case of SS2. But in SS1's case, they went for the more realistic, photo approach. Gives the game it's own unique style artistically. Or to be more accurate, in the PC versions case, by the look of it.

66ea001370262ZylonBane

66ea0013702b6
Whoever was in charge of retouching the Mac version log portraits seemed to believe that all women should wear red lipstick.

66ea001370415ZylonBane

66ea00137045d
Uh... what doesn't narrow what down? Were we trying to narrow something down?

66ea0013707dbHogdalen

66ea001370828
This is pure speculation on my part, but if the Mac image resource format is not the same as in DOS , it might be PICT (v2).

Some more information on the PICT format.

Of course it might well be less work to take screenshots of the game running in SheepShaver rather than working out and converting the original format.
11 Guests are here.
turn around bright eyes
Contact SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies
FEEP
66ea0013716eb