673fe222e27f1

673fe222e3cac
1 Guest is here.
 

Topic: System Shock 1 with Mac assets? Read 14177 times  

673fe222e441cHogdalen

673fe222e449d
Hi!

I just bought System Shock 1 Enhanced Edition, but it's not quite as I remember it. Has anyone attempted to mod it with the hi-res UI and portraits from the Mac version?

673fe222e4652voodoo47

673fe222e46a5
I think it would have been done long time ago, should it be possible/easy.
« Last Edit: 30. September 2015, 08:10:48 by voodoo47 »

673fe222e475bHogdalen

673fe222e47ba
Heh. I think you mean 'should it be easy'. But fair enough. I suppose I should be content that the Mac version is now perfectly playable in SheepShaver. Perhaps it would be easier to hack mouselook into that version.

673fe222e4ad4unn_atropos

673fe222e4c8fHogdalen

673fe222e4cf0
Yeah, if you want to call 256-color, 640 x 480 pixels "hi-res". But I think they are twice the resolution of the DOS portraits.

Screen from Mac SS1 running under Sheepshaver.

EDIT: Added an attempt at a comparison shot from the DOS version.
« Last Edit: 27. September 2015, 14:28:19 by Hogdalen »

673fe222e4dfbvoodoo47

673fe222e4e4b
I think hacking the higher resources out would be more viable.

673fe222e4f2eHogdalen

673fe222e4f7e
Some more comparisons, just to show the cool title screens and a Mac screenshot with correct gamma.
[title.png expired]
[lookingglass.png expired]
[origin.png expired]
[rebecca.png expired]
« Last Edit: 27. September 2015, 16:45:53 by Hogdalen »
673fe222e5112
I looked into this sometime ago. Most of the graphic assets seems to be in .rsrc files. I'm not Mac OS expert, but I think those can be extracted quite easily.
I will have to take another look someday.

673fe222e52ceZylonBane

673fe222e5374
It would be nice to at least have the high-res assets. Perhaps a future revival of Citadel Conversion Project could use them.

Still, it doesn't seem impossible to make the DOS version use them. SS1's GUI code is actually more sophisticated than SS2's, in that it will automatically scale all HUD elements to the same relative size on-screen no matter what the screen resolution is. In low-res modes the log portraits get scaled down, and in high-res modes they get scaled up. It seems likely that if the higher-res Mac log portraits were hacked into the DOS version, a la the high-res object textures, it would properly use them with no further modifications.

Anyone know what tool Gigaquad used to modify the resource files?

673fe222e54d2JosiahJack

673fe222e5526
Ooh, higher res portraits for the log files would be much appreciated for the Citadel Remake project.  If anyone has them available for download, please let me know.

Incidentally, they look washed out on the Mac version.  Is that normal, or just how the screenshots turned out?

673fe222e58cbZylonBane

673fe222e5926
Incidentally, they look washed out on the Mac version.  Is that normal, or just how the screenshots turned out?
I'm trying to figure out how you noticed the log icon being washed out while not noticing the entire screen being washed out.

673fe222e59d9JosiahJack

673fe222e5a2d
Incidentally, the screenshots look washed out ...sigh...ambiguity.
673fe222e5ba6
The Mac logs and text are actually cleaner looking even in the gamma corrected shots. you won't get crysis level out of any of it, but I really do hope these assets can be ported into the windows version gog sells.
673fe222e5cb9
I extracted some of the resources using DeRez (comes with Xcode). Next step is to try to convert them to usable formats. Hopefully they are the same as in DOS version (reversed byte order perhaps). I will look into this later.

673fe222e5d64Hogdalen

673fe222e5db1
That is excellent news, Gawain! Looking forward to hearing your progress.

673fe222e5e42JosiahJack

673fe222e5e8d
Awesome!  It'd be great to use them for the remake.

673fe222e5f8cicemann

673fe222e5fdb
Am I the only one who thinks the PC's assets look better?
Acknowledged by: Briareos H

673fe222e60d5unn_atropos

673fe222e6182
I wouldn't say better, but judging from the two portraits I've seen here, the mac versions look a bit more like they were drawn/painted instead of beeing photographs. Painted portraits may have a stronger association with games in the fantasy setting or the character design of early adventures, so they may seem a bit unfitting in a scifi game. Though I never had an issue with the drawn portraits in System Shock 2. They worked in favour of the cyberpunk style world, in my opinion.

673fe222e624aicemann

673fe222e6298
Most definitely in the case of SS2. But in SS1's case, they went for the more realistic, photo approach. Gives the game it's own unique style artistically. Or to be more accurate, in the PC versions case, by the look of it.

673fe222e639eZylonBane

673fe222e63fb
Whoever was in charge of retouching the Mac version log portraits seemed to believe that all women should wear red lipstick.

673fe222e6576ZylonBane

673fe222e65cd
Uh... what doesn't narrow what down? Were we trying to narrow something down?

673fe222e6a24Hogdalen

673fe222e6a78
This is pure speculation on my part, but if the Mac image resource format is not the same as in DOS , it might be PICT (v2).

Some more information on the PICT format.

Of course it might well be less work to take screenshots of the game running in SheepShaver rather than working out and converting the original format.
1 Guest is here.
Jute Preise und korrekte Kollegen. Watt willste mehr.
Contact SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies
FEEP
673fe222e7766