673fd7b88bfd9

673fd7b88d218
1 Guest is here.
 

Topic: System Shock 1 with Mac assets? Read 14165 times  

673fd7b88daadHogdalen

673fd7b88db1f
Hi!

I just bought System Shock 1 Enhanced Edition, but it's not quite as I remember it. Has anyone attempted to mod it with the hi-res UI and portraits from the Mac version?

673fd7b88dca0voodoo47

673fd7b88dcef
I think it would have been done long time ago, should it be possible/easy.
« Last Edit: 30. September 2015, 08:10:48 by voodoo47 »

673fd7b88dda1Hogdalen

673fd7b88ddf7
Heh. I think you mean 'should it be easy'. But fair enough. I suppose I should be content that the Mac version is now perfectly playable in SheepShaver. Perhaps it would be easier to hack mouselook into that version.

673fd7b88e11cunn_atropos

673fd7b88e287Hogdalen

673fd7b88e2d8
Yeah, if you want to call 256-color, 640 x 480 pixels "hi-res". But I think they are twice the resolution of the DOS portraits.

Screen from Mac SS1 running under Sheepshaver.

EDIT: Added an attempt at a comparison shot from the DOS version.
« Last Edit: 27. September 2015, 14:28:19 by Hogdalen »

673fd7b88e3c9voodoo47

673fd7b88e414
I think hacking the higher resources out would be more viable.

673fd7b88e542Hogdalen

673fd7b88e58e
Some more comparisons, just to show the cool title screens and a Mac screenshot with correct gamma.
[title.png expired]
[lookingglass.png expired]
[origin.png expired]
[rebecca.png expired]
« Last Edit: 27. September 2015, 16:45:53 by Hogdalen »
673fd7b88e6f7
I looked into this sometime ago. Most of the graphic assets seems to be in .rsrc files. I'm not Mac OS expert, but I think those can be extracted quite easily.
I will have to take another look someday.

673fd7b88e894ZylonBane

673fd7b88e8e7
It would be nice to at least have the high-res assets. Perhaps a future revival of Citadel Conversion Project could use them.

Still, it doesn't seem impossible to make the DOS version use them. SS1's GUI code is actually more sophisticated than SS2's, in that it will automatically scale all HUD elements to the same relative size on-screen no matter what the screen resolution is. In low-res modes the log portraits get scaled down, and in high-res modes they get scaled up. It seems likely that if the higher-res Mac log portraits were hacked into the DOS version, a la the high-res object textures, it would properly use them with no further modifications.

Anyone know what tool Gigaquad used to modify the resource files?

673fd7b88eaaaJosiahJack

673fd7b88eafd
Ooh, higher res portraits for the log files would be much appreciated for the Citadel Remake project.  If anyone has them available for download, please let me know.

Incidentally, they look washed out on the Mac version.  Is that normal, or just how the screenshots turned out?

673fd7b88edcaZylonBane

673fd7b88ee1b
Incidentally, they look washed out on the Mac version.  Is that normal, or just how the screenshots turned out?
I'm trying to figure out how you noticed the log icon being washed out while not noticing the entire screen being washed out.

673fd7b88eeb9JosiahJack

673fd7b88ef0b
Incidentally, the screenshots look washed out ...sigh...ambiguity.
673fd7b88f06a
The Mac logs and text are actually cleaner looking even in the gamma corrected shots. you won't get crysis level out of any of it, but I really do hope these assets can be ported into the windows version gog sells.
673fd7b88f166
I extracted some of the resources using DeRez (comes with Xcode). Next step is to try to convert them to usable formats. Hopefully they are the same as in DOS version (reversed byte order perhaps). I will look into this later.

673fd7b88f1f0Hogdalen

673fd7b88f239
That is excellent news, Gawain! Looking forward to hearing your progress.

673fd7b88f2c1JosiahJack

673fd7b88f30d
Awesome!  It'd be great to use them for the remake.

673fd7b88f42cicemann

673fd7b88f47d
Am I the only one who thinks the PC's assets look better?
Acknowledged by: Briareos H

673fd7b88f563unn_atropos

673fd7b88f5d5
I wouldn't say better, but judging from the two portraits I've seen here, the mac versions look a bit more like they were drawn/painted instead of beeing photographs. Painted portraits may have a stronger association with games in the fantasy setting or the character design of early adventures, so they may seem a bit unfitting in a scifi game. Though I never had an issue with the drawn portraits in System Shock 2. They worked in favour of the cyberpunk style world, in my opinion.

673fd7b88f682icemann

673fd7b88f6cd
Most definitely in the case of SS2. But in SS1's case, they went for the more realistic, photo approach. Gives the game it's own unique style artistically. Or to be more accurate, in the PC versions case, by the look of it.

673fd7b88f778ZylonBane

673fd7b88f7c4
Whoever was in charge of retouching the Mac version log portraits seemed to believe that all women should wear red lipstick.

673fd7b88f94fZylonBane

673fd7b88f999
Uh... what doesn't narrow what down? Were we trying to narrow something down?

673fd7b88fcfdHogdalen

673fd7b88fd49
This is pure speculation on my part, but if the Mac image resource format is not the same as in DOS , it might be PICT (v2).

Some more information on the PICT format.

Of course it might well be less work to take screenshots of the game running in SheepShaver rather than working out and converting the original format.
1 Guest is here.
Haven't you done that before? Don't do that.
Contact SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies
FEEP
673fd7b8908c2